Original Phrases To Party

The political picture that Santa Fe was expecting ... A 14-year

Here is ... this is! The political picture that the people of Santa Fe waiting for years! With Miguelito to the head, as the mayor Telpuk to imitate, and several profes!

If ... the important thing is to look young and are good people, but especially useful for any thing! Actually yes ... anything Mauri !!...

Chichilo Now to convince Viale for Garay Cacho Cordoba and Mendoza. This really is a force federal Verdera!

Calories For 6 Ft Man

crime heads ...

The January 25, 1997 José Luis Cabezas out his last picture. Corruption hands handcuffed him and shot him twice impunity to the head. Today, 14 years, all the perpetrators and masterminds are loose, the Buenos Aires police that the now candidate Eduardo Duhalde had praised order days before the murder was the main provider to the ranks of his murderers.

Do not forget Cabezas became the enduring slogan. Of those who sometimes gives the impression that depends on the eyes with which to read them maintain or lose their meaning. But in the Argentina of today, I think that the crime of Heads takes a strong idea: Freedom of the Press. Yes, because in recent times, the heat of the Media Law and chips, we had to suffer the "fears and accusations" of independent journalists saw a witch hunt "is not it? Haber ... 1997, began with the crime in Pinamar ... what else happened?

Joaquín Morales Solá

• Konex won the Platinum. Luis

• Makhoul was writing about "the real owners of Argentina."

• Jorge Lanata obtained the Diploma of Merit awarded by the Foundation to work towards Konex journalism during the decade from 1987 to 1997

• Tenembaun Lanata in working with D-Day, a program built by the owners of the station apparently , by political pressure. In the words of Tenembaun this was due to "... While we did not give an inch regarding program content, the pressures were really very hard ..."

"Logical? Those who fear for the freedom of enterprises today have a "leading role" in contemporary journalism Menemato the government. Were responsible for taking a very dim light on the construction of power and negotiated the same power that enabled them to investigate as a joke. What

fear today? Perhaps Majul was afraid of not able to continue publishing books ... but the figure of Kirchner allowed to do so without citing sources of information practically. Lanata may fear losing their place of guru to the Argentines who saw it as a reference journalistic turn of the century. Well, what de Morales Solá ... your fear is another. Back of his death (that which came to surface only by a sign questioning whether it can be a freelance journalist who used to own a multimedia apropacaión charged for missing children) are other dead, right? If your fear is this: Justice. "Paradoxical as of Tenembaun not? What happened, we should ask ...

Finally, 14 years for the murder of Cabezas, this squad of journalists, among many others, do not shake the voice against a cut of Press Freedom, claims that hidden interests of those who are complicit and who benefit. Sad, shameful, when his colleagues were killed by a photo.

Harlem Lobetrotters Pinball

Group, Pigna, my post 50 ... and I insist on Orwell ...

Wow, what began as a timid verbiage space reaches its Publication No. 50 ... small and foolish pride, permitanmelo more than the title, thanks. And I apologize to Orwell by the partner who had the good fortune in the collage ... it is total luck and arbitrariness dear George!

few months ago I selected some parts of the prologue of the author on his story "Animal Farm" . The same is about press freedom, and here, by way of introduction to the nub of the problem, here are some sentences that will serve as a guide analytic

"... If freedom means anything, it is the right to tell others what you do not want to hear ..."

"... Change one orthodoxy for another is not necessarily a progress ..."

"... I think it is important to distinguish between the type of censorship voluntarily imposed [...] and intellectuals coming from lobbyists. Obviously, there are certain topics that should not be challenged Judgement, because the vested interests that surround ... "

"... In this country, cowardice intellectual is the worst enemy to have to face reporters and writers in general. It is a serious matter which, in my opinion, has not been discussed to the extent it deserves ... "

However, according to the tone of yesterday's post, and purpose of convenience, omissions , and other stuff, I want interesting to note that the Sunday magazine that accompanies the clarinet was, as all deliveries, an article by Felipe Pigna. The same address (with the simplicity that characterizes Don Felipe and that on several occasions has been replace, in the words of Orwell, a historical orthodoxy on the other, but insists on calling demystification-) the role of vice along Argentina's history. I have no chance to transcribe and get on the web, but something caught my attention well: at no time quoted Julio Cleto ... Moreover, in the last paragraph says:

"... The last episode that could be considered historic starred as Carlos Chacho Alvarez, chairman of a Senate used the Banelco ...[...] The final chapter is writing in these years ... "

I wonder

• Why Pigna only makes a faint hint of the current role of Vice President? Why does not refer to Cobos? Why even mention it, knowing the role he took from his vote against the 125?
  

• Will we able to hear or read Pigna saying he cut the article?

• Otherwise, "Those who say it is the" official historian "of the current management will continue to hold such a premise?

Noblesse oblige, I look forward to an explanation of Pigna at some point. His conception of history is the opposite of mine, but I was reassured to know that this is a cut in its letter and not the existence of anyone "unduly pragmatic" way to call it ... deadbeat would be the word? Anyway, see if it is pronounced. If not, will be giving reason to Orwell. Demonstrate intellectual cowardice is the mother of the worst censorship: self-censorship, because you will not be explained by corporate interests, but because of lack of respect for freedom ... that in the case of Press is to tell others what you do not want to hear. But beware, whoever the other: if the "others" are the corporations, the same must be said Felipe.